It took Obama 9 months of stonewalling to finally say this

[Chief Arrowhead]

Sen. Rand Paul declared victory Thursday after Attorney General Eric Holder assured him that the president cannot use a drone to kill a noncombatant American on U.S. soil -- an assurance Paul had sought during his 13-hour filibuster the day before

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/03/07/historic-filibust er-renews-bipartisan-focus-on-drones-regulation/#ixzz2MusXGj CN (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/03/07/historic-filibuster-renews-bipartisan-focus-on-drones-regulation/#ixzz2MusXGjCN)

SO Obama, under duress, decided that he can't JUST KILL Americans who disagree with his regime.

And they also want to take away our guns.

[seasider7]

:hehe:

Did some people learn nothing from the Election Cycle brainwashing?

Come and join us outside of the Low Information Bubble, the weather is great.

[Chief Arrowhead]

Drone strikes in the US, that's what Obamaites are all about. Better the individual killed than the collective.

[seasider7]

You rambled months ago that Obama can use drones on us. Now you've been proven wrong, you are STILL moaning.

Holder confirms that is NOT legal.
Obama has NEVER advocated such.


What exactly is the problem? Well, apart from you having the red ass because of who got re-elected as President.

[Chief Arrowhead]

It took 10 hours of questioning and an 18 hour filibuster to get this statement:

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/closeread/2013/03/rand -paul-gets-a-letter-from-eric-holder.html (http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/closeread/2013/03/rand-paul-gets-a-letter-from-eric-holder.html)

It has come to my attention that you have now asked an additional question: “Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?” The answer to that question is no.
Sincerely,
Eric H. Holder, Jr.


Of course this is the sort of land that you are accustomed to:, but I ain't.

Which, I suppose, you find this a vile attack on your "Prezzz" Fo schizzle

[Chief Arrowhead]

Now, the big question is, will your Dear Leader, (after he's taken the guns), declare a state of Emergency?

[seasider7]

Again, what exactly is the problem? Apart from a man in the White House that is nothing like you in terms of appearance, education, or success in life.

You claimed Obama could use Drones on US citizens on US soil.

We waited months for your proof, we even thought your tantrum and flounce would give you time to research. Sadly, not.

Holder confirms Obama doesn't have the right, a thought that only existed in the minds of attention seeking scaremongers

All is good, right? Why the bitching? You should be happy to be wrong.

:titsup:

[Chief Arrowhead]

if they pose an "imminent threat" to the regime.

Who decides what is an "imminent threat"?

Shocked that you are such an Obamabot that you agree with this. Even John Cusak is opposed.

You really have to get your **** together .. biut I suppose that is an incapable request.

[seasider7]

Chief- Obama can use Drones on us!!!!
Holder - No, he can't.
Chief - See, I was right!



:clap:

[Gunner Since Time Began - born to moan]

[seasider7]

or that I do?

tick tick,..I'll wait right here.......

[Chief Arrowhead]

So, maybe I don't think like you .. and maybe I don't think like the President. Maybe you think more like the President so you are safe.

THAT, my friend, is why the Constitution of our country is so sacred .. which is why folks like me are disturbed when folks like you dis it.

[Chief Arrowhead]

http://swampland.time.com/2013/03/07/a-wake-up-call-on-drone s-what-the-john-brennan-debate-achieved/ (http://swampland.time.com/2013/03/07/a-wake-up-call-on-drones-what-the-john-brennan-debate-achieved/)

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/06/us/politics/brennan-vote-b y-senate-intelligence-panel.html (http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/06/us/politics/brennan-vote-by-senate-intelligence-panel.html)

Want more? You are supporting a corrupt regime, my friend.

[Chief Arrowhead]

That is true of most that can't make it on their own.

[seasider7]

I wonder if you just don't read the links you post or perhaps you are unknowingly arguing for the other (my) side of the argument.

:rubchin:

[Chief Arrowhead]

on US soil? Is that what you are saying?

[seasider7]

you do love an unsubstantiated claim to change the subject whenever you've been proven wrong.

In poker terms, it is your glaring 'tell' :nod:

[Chief Arrowhead]

on my house. Would you be in favor of that? After all, I am a vocal Obama antagonist. I might be an "imminent threat".. I have GUNS IN MY HOUSE

Are you in favor of a drone strike on me?

[Chief Arrowhead]

the answer should be "NO"

Instead, you want to know 'where exactly'

Just like all Socialists do, because the individual is meaningless compared to the Collective.

[seasider7]

you dopey old fart :shrug:

[Chief Arrowhead]

Wake up, my friend.

[seasider7]

perhaps you can answer it.

Again, I asked 'Where have stated I support drone strikes on.US citizens on US soil?'

you went off on a tangent about where' being your house :hehe:

[Chief Arrowhead]

Besides me, that is.

Amazing, really, that you will not disagree with Obama in any way about this. This is so obvious, yet look at the semantic gymnastics you are going through.

Party above country .. but then this isn't really your country, is it.

[seasider7]

However, as there is a well established precedent for such handling of US citizens by the US Govt, it all becomes eather moot.

[Alexism - Atheoist]

Bad bad news. Now of course this guy has an Arab name and was critical of US wars on Muslims, but the curtain was broken. He was never accused of a crime - the administration just said he had operational ties and then killed him because of it - no proof no trial no indictment - just bureaucrats in a secret room with a secret list.

Bad bad news.