PDA

View Full Version : Solving the football equation....What is next after the 4-2-3-1 bites the dust?



The Tony
02-15-2013, 11:06 AM
Last night saw further proof that the 4-4-2 is on its last legs. The majority of sides involved in last night's Europa League games all utilised the more fashionable and highly vaunted 4-2-3-1 system. Infact both Tottenham and Lyon opted to further implement the system for their match with the game ultimately decided by situations of a static nature. Its quite clear a lot of teams are now simply cancelling eachother out and as more sides take a favourable approach to the system the frequency of games where the outcome is purely decided by who has the better luck during the 90 minutes of play will increase dramatically. We are starting to see this unfold in the Premiership now as apart from the Manchester United being out clear the rest of the teams are realatively close behind and unable to make any inroads on their lead or build a gap on the sides in behind. This can be attributed to teams repeatedly cancelling each other and achieveing similar results over a selction of games.

The question now is what can be done to neutralize the popualarity of the 4-2-3-1 system but at the same time bring about an evolution in the football equation.

One possible solution is to eliminate the barriers and stuctures in the midfield and striker positions and have the players contained within deployed in a more advanced fluidic 4-6 formation with the players forward of the defence all evolving into a greater level of footballing abilty (see any Arsenal game for a example of this).

Classic Jorge
02-15-2013, 11:08 AM
Tactics are often responses to what comes before.

The Tony
02-15-2013, 11:14 AM
The 3-6-1 formation first laughed when employed by the majority of the US sides when the MLS was founded is now gaining popularity particular in Italy with his sides are now grinding out results and leaving it to luck to decide what happens. It seems more and more sides are opting to just cancel each other out and not take any risks. By that I mean the acceptance that both sides will gain equal opportunity by using the Game Theory Optimal Strategem.

Classic Jorge
02-15-2013, 11:16 AM

Peter
02-15-2013, 12:00 PM
They are not the same thing.

Aside from the back four, the numbers are largely meaningless. Shape and tactics are about players and managers, not numbers.

Classic Jorge
02-15-2013, 12:04 PM
Personally I see the formation as the framework on top of which tactics are applied.

Peter
02-15-2013, 12:11 PM
The phrase 'cancelling each other' was really bothering me as well. I dislike it.

I will just try and let it go.

Classic Jorge
02-15-2013, 12:23 PM

Peter
02-15-2013, 12:25 PM
I suspect you would consider it a bonus.

Luis Anaconda
02-15-2013, 12:31 PM
even if you do cancel each other out

7evens
02-15-2013, 12:39 PM
Immense tune btw..

Luis Anaconda
02-15-2013, 12:45 PM
The Osmonds scarred me - those teeth :yikes:

Classic Jorge
02-15-2013, 12:46 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zlViU5PBPY

Classic Jorge
02-15-2013, 12:47 PM

Luis Anaconda
02-15-2013, 12:49 PM

7evens
02-15-2013, 12:52 PM
Gripped by manic depression, he jumped from a 15 storey building.

This quote from his final hours

Hathaway said that "white people" were trying to kill him and had connected his brain to a machine, for the purpose of stealing his music and his sound. :-(

Classic Jorge
02-15-2013, 12:54 PM

Luis Anaconda
02-15-2013, 12:55 PM

Luis Anaconda
02-15-2013, 12:58 PM
can't remember it being any good

Classic Jorge
02-15-2013, 12:59 PM
A man whos numbers dont just go up to eleven, they also only go down to eleven.

Of course it's not any good.

Luis Anaconda
02-15-2013, 01:05 PM