So Mr Gazidis earns MORE then ALL the Chelsea directors put together

[Upskirt Jack]

http://arsenalaction.com/2012/10/03/ivan-gazidis-earns-2-1m- more-then-all-the-chelsea-directors/ (http://arsenalaction.com/2012/10/03/ivan-gazidis-earns-2-1m-more-then-all-the-chelsea-directors/)

[Maravilloso Marvo]

else.

If you take Gazidis for 2010-2011 for an apples to apples comparison then Man U and Man City both paid more to there respective men. And then also this news is about 12 months out of date.

Why not wait until you have 2011-2012 out for other clubs before trying to compare?

[Mack]

It's not as if any of this information is secret.

[Maravilloso Marvo]

[Upskirt Jack]

[Maravilloso Marvo]

[Classic Jorge]

So the big story here is that the one director who has to do a real job, ie running a club like a business, not like michael jackson on a shopping trip in Toys R Us, is paid slightly more than the ones whose only job is looking after a massive, oversized charity chequebook.

[Classic Jorge]

[Mack]

Because he's an idiot.

[Classic Jorge]

[Maravilloso Marvo]

[Upskirt Jack]

Lets face it we havent won anything for a very long time.

Other then making a profit what have they done to jusitfy a bonus?

[Maravilloso Marvo]

[Brentwood]

which we are able to pay for comfortably each year, without jeopardising the security or future of the club.

Oh, and if you want to include on the field achievements, then the fact that we finish in the top 4 every season, whilst servicing our loans is pretty impressive imo

If we hadn't made a defensive mistake in the last minute of the Birmingham Carling Cup final then I assume your view would be completely different?