seasider7
09-22-2012, 12:22 AM
I'll momentarily entertain you.
You have a wonderful knowledge of where to obtain data and talking points for this race. You cherry pick this data wisely, and dispel the likelihood that you are merely a naive and casual enthusiast.
Your attempts to cover your tracks with awful spelling is as telling as it is sporadic. I don't buy it for a moment.
After a week from hell, where all but the most vigourous of Romney supporters believe his campaign crashed & burned, you announce that (and I paraphrase) "the 47% comments have had no negative impact on Romney,..onwards and upwards to The White House" http://www.awimb.com/images/smiley_icons/rubchin.gif
After reigniting the whole 'Romney has something hide in his taxes' debate today by releasing a small drop of returns which aren't complete, instead of asking a legitimate question "What's he got to hide?" or " Oh ****, why he opened up this can of worms again?" or " What's all that money is offshore accounts in Bermuds/Caymans/Switzerland",.......you come out with " Romney donated more to charity than Obama,....next stop the White House for President Romney" http://www.awimb.com/images/smiley_icons/yikes.gif really? WTF? Superb, even Fox News would cringe trying to pivot that position.
Those two small examples show you are anything BUT a regular English guy with a passing interest in the USA Presidential race.
The spin you put out is soooooooooo wacko that you do yourself a disservice by making yourself unbelievable. It becomes obvious that you are being so extreme and controversial merely for the point of being so.
At that point it becomes obvious what you are.
You're a tedious Law Haw Haw, a kind of Lord Bore Bore if you like.
http://www.awimb.com/images/smiley_icons/wave.gif
You have a wonderful knowledge of where to obtain data and talking points for this race. You cherry pick this data wisely, and dispel the likelihood that you are merely a naive and casual enthusiast.
Your attempts to cover your tracks with awful spelling is as telling as it is sporadic. I don't buy it for a moment.
After a week from hell, where all but the most vigourous of Romney supporters believe his campaign crashed & burned, you announce that (and I paraphrase) "the 47% comments have had no negative impact on Romney,..onwards and upwards to The White House" http://www.awimb.com/images/smiley_icons/rubchin.gif
After reigniting the whole 'Romney has something hide in his taxes' debate today by releasing a small drop of returns which aren't complete, instead of asking a legitimate question "What's he got to hide?" or " Oh ****, why he opened up this can of worms again?" or " What's all that money is offshore accounts in Bermuds/Caymans/Switzerland",.......you come out with " Romney donated more to charity than Obama,....next stop the White House for President Romney" http://www.awimb.com/images/smiley_icons/yikes.gif really? WTF? Superb, even Fox News would cringe trying to pivot that position.
Those two small examples show you are anything BUT a regular English guy with a passing interest in the USA Presidential race.
The spin you put out is soooooooooo wacko that you do yourself a disservice by making yourself unbelievable. It becomes obvious that you are being so extreme and controversial merely for the point of being so.
At that point it becomes obvious what you are.
You're a tedious Law Haw Haw, a kind of Lord Bore Bore if you like.
http://www.awimb.com/images/smiley_icons/wave.gif