PDA

View Full Version : I had bad thoughts about Hillsborough. This was so wrong. I feel a bit embarrassed today



kilburn_ralph
09-12-2012, 01:38 PM
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/hillsborough-document s-released-brian-reade-1318730#.UFB_mutQIxk.twitter (http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/hillsborough-documents-released-brian-reade-1318730#.UFB_mutQIxk.twitter)

Guns 'n' Roses
09-12-2012, 01:48 PM
as a result of a pitch invasion at Highbury, because Arsenal refused to put fences between the supporters and the pitch, the FA deemed Highbury as not suitable to host an FA cup semi final.

Mack
09-12-2012, 01:52 PM
bollox. I'd forgotten how bad it was:
'Some fans picked pockets of victims. Some fans urinated on the brave cops. Some fans beat up PC giving kiss of life...drunken Liverpool fans viciously attacked rescue workers as they tried to revive victims and police officers, firemen and ambulance crews were punched, kicked and urinated upon'
http://www.awimb.com/images/smiley_icons/frown.gif

Monty91
09-12-2012, 01:58 PM
and general ill-health, culminating in a protracted and agonising death.

Luis Anaconda
09-12-2012, 02:00 PM
Mackenzie lost it that night as is well documented in a Guardian article on it all


http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2011/oct/17/sun-h illsborough-disaster (http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2011/oct/17/sun-hillsborough-disaster)

Classic Jorge
09-12-2012, 02:01 PM
Darren Anderton starred and subsequently went to spurs

Ashberto
09-12-2012, 02:02 PM
The Sun was amplifying and spouting the prejdices of the day. I also have it on good authority that Kelvin MacKenzie was a particularly odious piece of ****. His son was, too, from personal experience. Lovely wife though, oddly.

Luis Anaconda
09-12-2012, 02:04 PM
semi held there pre Hillsborough Everton Southampton in 84.

Classic Jorge
09-12-2012, 02:05 PM
Given the city was pretty much a socialist republic at the time

Luis Anaconda
09-12-2012, 02:05 PM
we didn't hold them for about 8 years though

Steve Williams - gay for Mark Knopfler
09-12-2012, 02:05 PM

Luis Anaconda
09-12-2012, 02:05 PM
before she went very weird

Luis Anaconda
09-12-2012, 02:06 PM
I think so yes

Mack
09-12-2012, 02:09 PM

Mack
09-12-2012, 02:10 PM

Monty91
09-12-2012, 02:11 PM
a police officer?

Indeed, it seems a lot of them did, and the objection was with the fact that the Sun presented it as gospel.

Sheds a slightly different light on it...

Mack
09-12-2012, 02:12 PM

Pat Vegas
09-12-2012, 02:12 PM

Luis Anaconda
09-12-2012, 02:15 PM

Monty91
09-12-2012, 02:17 PM
why does the Sun stand accused of lying?

Luis Anaconda
09-12-2012, 02:37 PM
if you repeat a lie you are lying particularly when you dress it up as THE TRUTH http://www.awimb.com/images/smiley_icons/shrug.gif That isn't a difficult concept surely

Monty91
09-12-2012, 02:39 PM
was a senior police officer and an MP, surely it is possible that the Sun did believe what it had been told?

Red N White Army
09-12-2012, 02:41 PM

Luis Anaconda
09-12-2012, 02:43 PM
and it wasn't. The defence, you believed what you have been told is not a particularly strong one when there was no corroborating evidence

Red N White Army
09-12-2012, 02:46 PM

Monty91
09-12-2012, 02:52 PM

Luis Anaconda
09-12-2012, 02:55 PM

Monty91
09-12-2012, 03:07 PM
Repeating a lie in the belief that it is true is not lying.

wibble the lobster
09-12-2012, 03:11 PM
{mind you to be fair even saddam at one stage was saying he had them and would use them}

on hillsborough, it was always strongly suspected that the police had spun to protect themselves. Can't say I ever swallowed the sun story in that case,

Luis Anaconda
09-12-2012, 03:12 PM
grand schemes of these ridiculous semantics? I am really not sure why you arguing. They printed lies/ they lied it really doesn't make a difference in the grand scheme of things. Repeated a libel because you believe it to be true is no defence in a libel case should it turn out to be false - you will still have libelled someone. No difference here http://www.awimb.com/images/smiley_icons/judge.gif

Monty91
09-12-2012, 03:19 PM
, they decided there was no requirement for corroboration.

Of course, there would also have been commercial imperatives. It was a great splash to go with in the immediate aftermath of a huge national tragedy.

The same reason the papers went with Bin Laden's face after 9/11 as soon as it was suggested he was the perpetrator.

Luis Anaconda
09-12-2012, 03:23 PM

Monty91
09-12-2012, 03:32 PM
of an uncorroborated claim.

All newspapers do it, when a) the source is impeccable b) there is no risk of being sued.