Guns 'n' Roses
09-03-2012, 10:48 AM
Sure, it wouldn't have been an outrageous call to give the little **** a pelanty in that situation. Per was a tad wreckless. But you know, Howard probably was tired of his antics. What did annoy me though, was the Nog pundits, including Claus Druggy Lundekvam.
a) "Being held in the shoulder prevented Suarez from reaching the ball, which he clearly would have had he not been held"
b) "Suarez didn't dive when he fell, he had nothing to win by falling, so he was fouled"
Rubbish both, imo. He would never have reached the cross, and he threw himself down like a sack of potatoes when he realised he would not reach the ball.
Massive dive. http://www.awimb.com/images/smiley_icons/judge.gif
a) "Being held in the shoulder prevented Suarez from reaching the ball, which he clearly would have had he not been held"
b) "Suarez didn't dive when he fell, he had nothing to win by falling, so he was fouled"
Rubbish both, imo. He would never have reached the cross, and he threw himself down like a sack of potatoes when he realised he would not reach the ball.
Massive dive. http://www.awimb.com/images/smiley_icons/judge.gif