(whoever it is) thinks he's better than young Rob Holding?
So is CC better than RH, and if so, shouldn't we be keeping him?
People last season thought RH was a future Eng player, so if CC is better we could have the future Eng CH pairing. But the one game they played together, we got 4 put past us. (Though it was the first game of the season.)
What I'm sort of asking is if this means:
1. CC is actually good.
2. RH is actually ****.
3. This Boothroyd chap is wrong, and AW and the fans were right to think RH is good but CC is ****.
I just quite like CC, I thought he had potential as a CH in his early appearances, and would like him to be good. We used to win things when we had two Eng players at CH.