Quite a simplistic analysis but yes they did given the rather fortuitous situation they found themselves in when Son scored given the most obvious penalty decision ever had gone in their favour.
Should really have been out of the tie at the end of the first leg when Juve let slip the two goal lead.
It's all the, better team over both legs, etc. Well, if you're the better over both legs and still manage to lose, then surely that is the epitome of bottling it!?
It's all the, better team over both legs, etc. Well, if you're the better over both legs and still manage to lose, then surely that is the epitome of bottling it!?
Yes I heard that on BT Sports, might have been Lampard.
Nonsense really. They played well and the result in Turin was indeed a fine one but Juve allowed them a foothold in the game based on the first leg.
In general the reaction to the 2-2 draw was quite hysterical.
Yes I heard that on BT Sports, might have been Lampard.
Nonsense really. They played well and the result in Turin was indeed a fine one but Juve allowed them a foothold in the game based on the first leg.
In general the reaction to the 2-2 draw was quite hysterical.
I didn't see the match as was away but heard ALL about it and assumed Spurs had won 2 or 3 nil, was a little surprised to find out it was 2-2 and Juve missed a penalty
I didn't see the match as was away but heard ALL about it and assumed Spurs had won 2 or 3 nil, was a little surprised to find out it was 2-2 and Juve missed a penalty
Purely for balance that media reaction would have been the same no matter which English club had managed to come back from 0-2 away to a genuine European giant.
The fact that Spurs have 2-3 of the future of English football in their side just feeds into it.