Funny to think back to a time when rickyg would routinely wish cancer

[Sir C]

quite.

Worked in Brighton, went to a boarding school, of course he's a gayer, etc...

interesting (if you are into that sort of thing) case law re: discrimination by perception in this case.

English v Thomas Sanderson Ltd

The issue in the appeal is whether someone who is ribbed or teased – or, it might be said, tormented – by "homophobic banter" (the phrase used in this case) is or may be thereby harassed within the meaning of Regulation 5 when (a) he is not gay, (b) he is not perceived or assumed to be gay by his fellow workers, and (c) he accepts that they do not believe him to be gay.


http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2008/1421.html

That's the trouble with having laws qua laws. So much in life is open to interpretation.

[IUFG]

So much in life is open to interpretation.

especially homophobic bantz. A great effort as a defence imo