Which bit is the utter ****?Originally Posted by Peter
Which bit is the utter ****?
Hitler was left wing (yaaaaawn)........
His particular brand of 'racism' is too enlightened for people to understand..... (dear God).....
Civilisation is over because the Mayor of London doesn't sufficiently pronounce the letter t..........
I mean, he always talked **** but his music used to be good.
you're half right there, p
“Other clubs never came into my thoughts once I knew Arsenal wanted to sign me.”
Nice little Smiths quote there- well done
1. Whether or not the truth bores you, Hitler was a National Socialist who described himself as a socialist and behaved like a socialist.
2. Just calling him a racist doesn't make him so, which is kind of his point.
3. That the mayor of the world's greatest city is an ignorant pygmy of the calibre of that man is quite a damning indictment, isn't it?
1. Hitler called himself a lot of things. Are we now defining him in his own words?
2. THat isnt what he said.
3. No, it isnt. His predecessor was a buffoon who could barely tie his own laces without instructions. Am I expected to believe that civilisation hinges on his accent?
1. Hitler has no right to self-define? What if he had self-defined as a woman, would you misgender him, you monster?
2. Semantics.
3. You are referring to our esteemed foreign secretary. A little respect wouldn't go amiss.
1. It is nonsensical, not to mention extremely offensive, to equate modern left wing people with Hitler. As it is with pretty much anyone. It is also facile and childish. Any view of National Socialism that considers it left wing is the work of an idiot.
2. I thought we had established that I was anti-semantic, like the rest of the Labour Party.
3. My respect is ex officio. It does not extend to the incumbent.
Last edited by Peter; 04-17-2018 at 03:46 PM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote