Reply With QuoteShe's right about this, but I'm not going to argue about it because I can't be bothered.
You think I'm immoral - so be it.
It's baffling.
"Diane Abbott urges PM to block Julian Assange extradition."
Is there some lefty university course that drums into you the mantra, "When examining an issue always seek the immoral course of action."
She's right about this, but I'm not going to argue about it because I can't be bothered.
You think I'm immoral - so be it.
I don't for a second think you're immoral. We happen to disagree on this issue but I know you to be a thinking, cogent human being.Originally Posted by Ash
The Abbotts and Corbyns of our benighted land neither think nor feel. They will always choose the anti-establishment, or anti_West, or anti-Amerika, or anti-Israel view, whether right or wrong. That's what's immoral.
David Lammy manages itIt's baffling.
"Diane Abbott urges PM to block Julian Assange extradition."
Is there some lefty university course that drums into you the mantra, "When examining an issue always seek the immoral course of action."
There's not a single part of me that wouldn't be absolutely overjoyed if Lammy got Jo Cox'ed.
I don't know if he has kids, I don't know if he has a sick parent who desperately relies upon the physical and emotional support of their son.
I just want him to get deaded
OK. Putting aside the fact that her reason for not allowing him to be extradited in order to face trial is that the charges against him have not been tested in a court of law (which you have to agree is monstrously fúcking stupid given that he avoided that happening by hiding in the Embassy), can we just take a look at the rank hypocrisy of saying 'We believe all rape victims - unless the accused is someone we see as an ally'?
Or perhaps we ought to consider for one moment the sheer horror of having a putative Home Secretary (in other words the person who would hold ultimate responsibility for our security services and police) who refuses to accept the necessity of states keeping certain information secret or accept that individuals do not have the right to divulge state secrets without regard for the consequences?
I'm sorry, a, but this is not acceptable on any level.
Last edited by Burney; 04-12-2019 at 01:37 PM.
Iz it coz he iz black, Monty?There's not a single part of me that wouldn't be absolutely overjoyed if Lammy got Jo Cox'ed.
I don't know if he has kids, I don't know if he has a sick parent who desperately relies upon the physical and emotional support of their son.
I just want him to get deaded
Went to Harvard Law School so he ain't stupid. What's he done?
He's clearly a fúcking genius.
I tend to agree. The other day, Remain MPs were whining about feeling threatened and having nasty words said to them and I thought: 'You know what? Good. If our elected representatives choose to set themselves in opposition to those who elected them, they absolutely should be frightened.'There's not a single part of me that wouldn't be absolutely overjoyed if Lammy got Jo Cox'ed.
I don't know if he has kids, I don't know if he has a sick parent who desperately relies upon the physical and emotional support of their son.
I just want him to get deaded
A few MPs dangling from lampposts pour encourager les autres would be no bad thing.
Looooool. That’s like something from Brass Eye.
Posting Permissions