until they return to the circuit.
Presumably this will apply to men who take paternity leave too?
Honestly, this gender pay gap business is sending me a bit crazy. I've never, ever seen an issue universally reported and discussed with such specious dishonesty.
There were two documentaries on it last night across the five terrestrial main channels.
It's actually significantly more mental than the transers stuff. Which is pretty fúcking mental.
“Other clubs never came into my thoughts once I knew Arsenal wanted to sign me.”
I saw a story earlier about Navratilova complaining she gets just 10% of what McEnroe gets on BBC for Wimbledon coverage.
Now I am no tennis buff but on the summer evening when I do see any tennis he (McEnroe) appears to be a constant presence while the Navratilova is not, presumably off doing lezzer stuff.
Yet the basis of the issue appeared to be simply reduced to man gets loads, man /lady gets less.
I think these changes will apply after the baby is born, at which point a man may very well want to take over the child-caring responsibilities. My question is, will the advocates of this rule change also demand the same for men who want to hang out with their sprog for 2 years and then return to the game?