No, they should have lots of refs to reduce the number of matches that indiduals referee, so as to reduce the possibility of hypothetically corrupt individuals having a major impact on the game. And those who think that there is not, and has never been, corruption in football are mistaken. From major European leagues to World Cups, corruption is a matter of historical record.
What difference does it make? Did you see this?:
http://www.awimb.com/showthread.php?...=1#post4201680
None, if they are all corrupt but such a measure would be working from the standpoint that they're not.
Really? I'd lost interest in recent weeks tbh. As the exposure of the FBI/DOJ interfering with the election and attempting a coup didn't seem to register as a scandal I assumed that nothing would ever change. #LongLiveTheSwamp
Unless you mean the 'Hillary tape'. They can't show it and it's being called a fake anyway.