It's referees in general. Look at them. They're the sort of narcissistic sneaks who were despised at school and never had girlfriends, but nonetheless retained a mystifying sense of their own superiority. Thus, as adults they seek out positions of public authority where they can lord it over others while cravenly siding with where they perceive the power to lie.
Basically, they're all power-mad sexual and social inadequates and I have very little doubt that many of them are charlie chesters.
Yes - as we well know, "fans" (or ex-players) can be the harshest critics, while those with no connections to the club can be the biggest cheerleaders. Dear old Dorset would never accept that Daniel Taylor wasn't a United fan, merely someone whose job relied on covering the club, despite me proving to him that Taylor was a Forest supporter from Nottingham who had written books on being a Nottingham Forest fan
It's the same syndrome, but crucially, football refereeing (at the top level in particular) gives them a huge stage upon which to display their inordinate egotistical cüntery. This is crucial. You have to bear in mind that, when you're booing a referee, he's almost certainly getting sexual pleasure from it and has as huge an erection as his shrivelled and useless manhood will allow.
and now the proliferation of them with TV spots or with their own newspaper columns (Foy, Webb, Gallagher, Poll, Halsey, Clattenburg - did I miss anyone) is showing them up to be the attention seeking pricks we all knew them to be. Which makes the lack of access after a game to the ones actually still going even more of a farce.
Speaking of attention seekers - who can forget this ****
http://www.jeffwinterentertainmentandmedia.co.uk