Originally Posted by
Peter
We have bowled them out twice in three tests.
The batting may have cost us the three tests but big improvements there would only have got us draws. Our bowling ias just not capable of taking 20 wickets.
So be it. We cant construct a bowling attack based on the needs of one tour every year. All these people screaming for 90mph bowlers- would they seriously want to field them instead of Broad and Anderson in every series?
Stokes would have made a difference but we were never going to retain the ashes. Not losing 5-0 would have been nice though....