Of course, but not in the way you mean, I think. Pointing out what's wrong with him always, and only, seems to draw closer attention to what's even worse about his opposition. Or how any such specific objections to him remind everyone that they would be better, more justifiably, aimed at them #BoomerangEffect
"Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.
"But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."
"Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.
"But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."
That's true if you only pay attention to his silliest and most popular tweets though; there's already been plenty of real substance, or "winning", as they're calling it, to keep conservatives happy enough. And lots to encourage people who thought he'd be a total disaster to give him the benefit of the doubt next time around.
The Supreme Court, the stock market, GDP, unemployment, business investment and confidence, tax reform, Paris, Energy, Net Neutrality, The VA, NATO, illegal immigration, his new voter fraud investigation commission and so on.
Trade could be a banana skin for some true conservatives, of course, and it's naturally still early days, but he's doing alright, I reckon. Any first year Republican president would be happy with that.
"Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.
"But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."
Oh, and for anyone curious about Peter Strzok (remember the name, he may become famous) with seven minutes to spare might find this at least entertaining, and possibly interesting.
Some readable links, for those who don't like watching videos (the clip is good though, and Christopher Wreh is in it).
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archive...ter-strzok.php
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/ji...rticle/2642851
Last edited by Ash; 12-08-2017 at 12:42 AM.
I don't really call a lot of these victories. They're simply negations of the previous guy, and as such, are subject again to reversal. Of your list, I would say: economy (a biggie, not that's all him. But it is definitely in part him), the supreme court, and environmental ****e. The rest is a bunch of crap. Oh, and war with north korea is a win. In my book. But that's because I favor canned foods and time off for reading in my bunker.
I guess part of me just doesn't understand how an ostensibly fair-minded person could not look at this and dismiss it as minor. Or at least, as no less minor than all the other people in the current administration who use their private email, etc., sometimes on non-encrypted phones. Kushner, Kelly, and so on. There's just no sense of fairness, just a general repetition of this one point. One might even suspect that you had been listening to infowars, fox news, or the washington examiner...
Jk, you know I love yalls.