Originally Posted by WES Well yeah but my question isn't so much about why people like the Royals, it's why in particular the Royals doctoring photos matters to anyone. Who cares if they touched up a photo? Indeed, preferable to Prince Andrew touching up kids
Originally Posted by PSRB Indeed, preferable to Prince Andrew touching up kids If booming a 17 year old makes him a *****, I hope to god no one goes through my catalogue of 1980s indiscretions.
Originally Posted by Sir C If booming a 17 year old makes him a *****, I hope to god no one goes through my catalogue of 1980s indiscretions. Tell us more
Originally Posted by Sir C If booming a 17 year old makes him a *****, I hope to god no one goes through my catalogue of 1980s indiscretions. Legal here though......which does make the whole 'outrage' here, all a bit odd.
Originally Posted by PSRB Legal here though......which does make the whole 'outrage' here, all a bit odd. I'm not entirely sure her age was entirely the full extent of the problem
Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda I'm not entirely sure her age was entirely the full extent of the problem No, but it is in regards Prince Andrew.
Originally Posted by PSRB No, but it is in regards Prince Andrew. BREAKING NEWS! they found another photo that the Prince insists is unaltered. https://babylonbee.com/news/prince-w...hoto-untouched
Forum Rules