Seems a touch lenient based on the spend infringements vs Everton's*
*According to Twitter
Seems a touch lenient based on the spend infringements vs Everton's*
*According to Twitter
They’ll no doubt appeal, if for no other reason than to reduce it to 2 or 3. All part of the game.
More importantly, with each example of this type of punishment, City come one step closer to a massive deduction/fine/something else.Originally Posted by 7sisters
Sorry, I just don't see how the FA can allow anything else to happen without making themselves and the league look ridiculous.
Innocent until proven guilty, and all that
I don't want to win a title because they have been docked points. Would be a hollow victory. (City, not Forest!)
I'll take it, 100%Innocent until proven guilty, and all that
I don't want to win a title because they have been docked points. Would be a hollow victory. (City, not Forest!)
Right. Spot on. Cheating *******s.
"Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.
"But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."
So would I. And I think the Scousers et al showed be retrospectively awarded titles for years they cheated. And us for last year. And they should be relegated a division for every season they've cheated.
Boars, imo. And that goes for Nottingham Forest too.Innocent until proven guilty, and all that
I don't want to win a title because they have been docked points. Would be a hollow victory. (City, not Forest!)
"Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.
"But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."
I'd go for it if we can. I doubt any retrospective action will take place.Innocent until proven guilty, and all that
I don't want to win a title because they have been docked points. Would be a hollow victory. (City, not Forest!)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote