To be clear, I’m not questioning the number of deaths, I’m questioning the idea that the only way to avoid them is by a full lockdown (which the scientists told us we needed) rather than a more intelligent, evidence-based lockdown, and how many deaths we might have ultimately experienced without a full lockdown.Originally Posted by IUFG
I would have thought that counting deaths would be quite easy - simply based on whether a human being is either dead or not.
Don't tell me that death is now also non-binary
And I’m pointing out that the reason we didn’t explore a different approach is because the scientists couldn’t admit they didn’t know and the Prime Minister lacked the balls to call them on it.
The fat, blithering idiot.
Reply With Quote