autism and impaired cognition?
https://www.theguardian.com/society/...ex-court-rules
autism and impaired cognition?
https://www.theguardian.com/society/...ex-court-rules
Where does his freedom to pursue sex end and the right of others not to be sexually threatened by him begin?
Clearly he represents a sexual threat or the case would never have been brought. Whether that is his fault or not isn't really the point. If he represents a substantive threat, his freedom ought to be restricted. After all, we effectively do this via the Mental Health Act with sectioning, etc.
Ah, to stop the person being sent to a low or medium secure hospital because of his 'offending behaviour', no doubt.
He only touches women (or men) up because he's autistic. And has a fundamental right to sex. Obviously a greater fundamental right than that of a woman (or man) not to be molested by a mentalist.
Lawyers and judges should be embarassed to take their salaries and fees for supporting this sort of nonsense.
“Other clubs never came into my thoughts once I knew Arsenal wanted to sign me.”