Click here for Arsenal FC news and reports

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Archer out, Woakes in

  1. #1

    Archer out, Woakes in

    right call?

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by PSRB View Post
    right call?
    Abso-fúcking-lutely terrible call.

    No problem with Woakes in. My problem is that Broad is in ahead of Archer. I don't give a shít how many wickets he's got.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Burney View Post
    Abso-fúcking-lutely terrible call.

    No problem with Woakes in. My problem is that Broad is in ahead of Archer. I don't give a shít how many wickets he's got.
    I know it was only Ireland but that was one hell of a spell from Broad. I do think he knows he'll be the one to make way

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Burney View Post
    Abso-fúcking-lutely terrible call.

    No problem with Woakes in. My problem is that Broad is in ahead of Archer. I don't give a shít how many wickets he's got.
    You'd pick a bowler struggling with injury for a five-day Test match - brave, and dare I say, stupid call, b

  5. #5
    So I got this wrong

    Didn’t know it was Archer or Woakes or Anderson debate lol

    -

    Thought it was obvious...drop Moeen and go in all guns blazing with the 4 and break the Aussies

    You guys are weird lol

    Actually when you think about..Archer is the one bowler with top class recent firm vs the Aussies.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda View Post
    You'd pick a bowler struggling with injury for a five-day Test match - brave, and dare I say, stupid call, b
    If we dropped Moeen and played Leach as an opener - can't do worse than Burns - then we'd have 4 quicks other than Archer and a spinner. If he breaks down on the first morning, you've only lost the combined runs of Burns and Ali (i.e. fück all) and the difference in spin bowling of Ali vs Leach. {Seemed similar in SL or wherever.}

    Yes, I know his FC average is about 5 this year. But he doesn't look any worse than Burns. Or Jennings. Or most of the other cünts we've tried since Strauss quit.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult View Post
    If we dropped Moeen and played Leach as an opener - can't do worse than Burns - then we'd have 4 quicks other than Archer and a spinner. If he breaks down on the first morning, you've only lost the combined runs of Burns and Ali (i.e. fück all) and the difference in spin bowling of Ali vs Leach. {Seemed similar in SL or wherever.}

    Yes, I know his FC average is about 5 this year. But he doesn't look any worse than Burns. Or Jennings. Or most of the other cünts we've tried since Strauss quit.
    Bit harsh on Cook

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by PSRB View Post
    Bit harsh on Cook

  9. #9
    Joe Willock should be opening with Roy anyways

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult View Post
    If we dropped Moeen and played Leach as an opener - can't do worse than Burns - then we'd have 4 quicks other than Archer and a spinner. If he breaks down on the first morning, you've only lost the combined runs of Burns and Ali (i.e. fück all) and the difference in spin bowling of Ali vs Leach. {Seemed similar in SL or wherever.}

    Yes, I know his FC average is about 5 this year. But he doesn't look any worse than Burns. Or Jennings. Or most of the other cünts we've tried since Strauss quit.
    Yeah - Jimmy got 80 once. He can open with him as well. FFS

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •