Quote Originally Posted by Burney View Post
That's because the fact that it cannot survive outside the womb is completely irrelevant. The point at which children can survive outside the womb has transformed dramatically due to medical science. So was it OK to kill those foetuses before those advances, but it isn't now? Nothing has changed ethically, after all.
And presumably, by that logic, were medical science to advance to the point where a child can be kept alive at any point after conception, you would be forced to concede that all abortion would have to be made illegal?
That argument is nonsensical.
Well, this could make things a whole lot more complicated

https://metro.co.uk/2019/05/14/human...ecade-8156458/

The Metro, I know, but...