You might as well argue that a child is not fully human because it hasn’t yet grown to adulthood and cannot survive without adult protection and therefore should not be afforded the same protections in law.
Instead we take the view thatbthat vulnerability is exactly why the law protects children even more than it does adults.
It therefore seems bizarre to me that we abandon this rationale when it comes to children at their most vulnerable - ie when they’re in the womb. It’s simply nonsensical.
Oh, and we’re all just ‘a mass of cells’, btw.
Originally Posted by Burney
You might as well argue that a child is not fully human because it hasn’t yet grown to adulthood and cannot survive without adult protection and therefore should not be afforded the same protections in law.
Reply With Quote