62,062 is the absolute stadium capacity. In football mode the front 3 rows aren't used (2 of them aren't even there with the grass pitch rolled out) and there is also seats lost to segregation etc. We'll never be able to get 62,062.
62,062 is the absolute stadium capacity. In football mode the front 3 rows aren't used (2 of them aren't even there with the grass pitch rolled out) and there is also seats lost to segregation etc. We'll never be able to get 62,062.
Thanks for sharing. Might I ask why this is important/relevant/interesting?Originally Posted by PSRB
The fact you're asking me to explain this to you, demonstrates why everyone thinks you're a prick
Brutal and effective.
Did you shawarma?
Nah. Went to Petts Wood and ate some Turkish nonsense. Home by 7.30 for a Game of Thrones. Lovely stuff.
I'd go as far to say
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmDUdpKl7iM
back of the net
I'm not sure that anyone actually cares what the capacity of their stadium is. It's obviously a better stadium than the Emirates. Sadly for them, stadiums don't equal prizes.
They care. They were going to make the capacity one more thousand than ours just so they could go "ya boo sucks". Then they thought "Where can you go from there?". And the answer was "One more" again. The Naming Rights Stadium. The stadium that's turned up to eleven. Twelve even.
And it may be better than The Grove is some shiny respects, and if it bankrupts the buggers it will certainly be a Good Thing, but it has the major disadvantage of being in Tottenham. Edmonton, practically. We have Upper Street and Cannonbury to enjoy either side of the match. They have the High Road.
What's the story with Cannonbury, a? In all my years, I don't think I've ever visited Cannonbury. Is it a bustling village with bars, restaurants and chic boutiques like Hampstead, or something more edgy, a little more earthy, like Finsbury Park without the knives?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote