I thought yesterday's motion was to remove no deal as a possibility from the March 29th deadline?
I would like to remain as I think it would be far better for my generation of people, but I can't help but feel the threat of no deal was our biggest bargaining chip to use against the EU. Now that is removed it's May/Corbyn/anyone else's deal Vs Remain.
Bloody stupid, if you ask me. But perhaps I've misunderstood.
Because politicians know better than the voting public, rOriginally Posted by Rich
“Other clubs never came into my thoughts once I knew Arsenal wanted to sign me.”
Well I suppose that is true given that most of the public are poorly educated beasts. But surely, surely any attempt to get a better deal from the EU would have been helped by us threatening to walk away with no deal.
The EU have played a blinder here and refused to blink. Now anyone trying to obtain a better deal is just hoping for goodwill from the EU.
Nope, not understood at all. It's bloody ridiculous, when negotiating anything you always have to have the option to walk away. It's as if they're all ****ing stupid
Yes, it's a terrible negotiating stance, and they're doing it because they have never had any intention of implementing the Leave decision.
So Ash - you're clearly a politically astute chap so 'splain me this. Why does this speaker bloke, practically a convicted rapist by all accounts, insist on bellowing out the result of a vote we have all managed to hear perfectly well just two seconds before?
Strikes me as a bit of a garrulous arse.
it's to make us look more ridiculous when it is shown on news outlets around the world
In addition to all the infantile hooting, hollering and general baboonery?
he looks like a reject from Eggheads or QI or something.
I've no idea, Herbs. Apparently monstrous pomposity is a prime component of parliamentary procedure.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote