Reply With QuoteThe decision to give him a 2 yr extension (and all the staff), and then for him to want to sign Ozil on a £17.5m per year contract are shown to be ****ing stupidOriginally Posted by Pat Vegas
The decision to give him a 2 yr extension (and all the staff), and then for him to want to sign Ozil on a £17.5m per year contract are shown to be ****ing stupid
Northern Monkey ... who can't upload a bleeding Avatar
I remember you saying that the day we signed Ozil. Furious, you were.
To be honest I was just as excited when we signed Arshavin.
then he suddenly become ****terer
Don't be a cock.. I know that is your default position
Northern Monkey ... who can't upload a bleeding Avatar
Firstly, many people objected to the extension and Ozil’s contract. Secondly, even if they didn’t, so what?
Both decisions with hindsight were proven to be the wrong ones.
if by 'sacked' you mean his contract came to a premature end, then yes.
Unless he (Wenger) resigned, any contractual obligations would have needed to be settled.
In any case. I'm sure £17m would sweeten the deal.
“Other clubs never came into my thoughts once I knew Arsenal wanted to sign me.”
Bouldie must be on Justin Beiber monies considering we didn’t kick him to the kerb as well.
Can’t be his usefulness as a defensive coach imo
Don't think the club could have let Sanchez and Ozil both leave in a short period.Firstly, many people objected to the extension and Ozil’s contract. Secondly, even if they didn’t, so what?
Both decisions with hindsight were proven to be the wrong ones.
Well they could have.
Makes you wonder when they actually decided AW would be got rid of? IF they had an idea earlier in the season that it was on the cards then letting both of the players go might not have been a bad idea rather than offering a huge contract to the 1 player nobody seemed to want to sign anyway.
Northern Monkey ... who can't upload a bleeding Avatar
Posting Permissions