Reply With QuoteAlthough, talking of all that sort of thing; did you see, Jimmy was at it again last night. We are going to miss him, you know. We're going to miss him terriblyOriginally Posted by Burney
That was a misunderstanding. I was simply adjusting my surgical truss and people got the wrong idea.
Although, talking of all that sort of thing; did you see, Jimmy was at it again last night. We are going to miss him, you know. We're going to miss him terribly
"Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.
"But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."
Did you see the guardian article saying we’re not allowed to call black players “big and strong” or “powerful” anymore?
Yes. He bowled far too short in the morning, though. Still impressive for a chap of 36 to put together 24 overs and take four for flumpence - even if it is against the Windies.Although, talking of all that sort of thing; did you see, Jimmy was at it again last night. We are going to miss him, you know. We're going to miss him terribly
In other news: the decision to drop Broad is baffling. Curran is no strike bowler.
Are we allowed to call the big ones 'a beast'?
Agnew said that Broad isn't playing as he got absolutely bitten to shreds by bed bugs in the hotel, did he not?
If there were any more proof needed. There isn't. That you know the square-root of three-eighths of fúck all about football...
there it is...
“Other clubs never came into my thoughts once I knew Arsenal wanted to sign me.”
Goodness, no. "A big unit" perhaps.
If Butler hadn't dropped Hetmyer, they'd have been all out last night. Was one hell of a spell from JimmyAlthough, talking of all that sort of thing; did you see, Jimmy was at it again last night. We are going to miss him, you know. We're going to miss him terribly
I'm not sure that's a reason not to play a test match, r.
Posting Permissions