Crossword clue complaint

[Burney]

Of course I don't do crosswords of any description. They're silly word games really, aren't they?

I think of the brain as a muscle. I prefer to keep it exercised with philosophical thought.

You just don't do them because you know your wife will get involved and complete them in seconds flat.

[IUFG]

You just don't do them because you know your wife will get involved and complete them in seconds flat.

did you see University Challenge the other night?

we have our new Bobby Seagull.

[Sir C]

did you see University Challenge the other night?

we have our new Bobby Seagull.

Christ yes, that bloke knew... everything.

He must be a fúcking blast at parties.

[IUFG]

Christ yes, that bloke knew... everything.

He must be a fúcking blast at parties.

I got 7 correct answers, that episode. The GLW got 8

[IUFG]

Christ yes, that bloke knew... everything.

He must be a fúcking blast at parties.

fúck me, even the UC crowd are becoming 'celebrities' now

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-45217265

[Sir C]

fúck me, even the UC crowd are becoming 'celebrities' now

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-45217265

Christ. A shouty Canadian on our screens. Just what we need.

[Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult]

Gosh, you must be really, really, really intelligent. You put me to shame and I feel utterly humiliated. Really I do.

Now, tell us all you know about probability theory and we can all have a good laugh at your expense.

Probability theory says "The outcome of a random event cannot be determined before it occurs."

But the quantum eraser variation on the double split experiment shows that's bøllocks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6HLjpj4Nt4&t=14s

The first entangled particle know which random path its twin will take before it reaches the first of the two splitters than randomly send it in different directions.

It's fücking mind-blowing.

[Ash]

Probability theory says "The outcome of a random event cannot be determined before it occurs."

But the quantum eraser variation on the double split experiment shows that's bøllocks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6HLjpj4Nt4&t=14s

The first entangled particle know which random path its twin will take before it reaches the first of the two splitters than randomly send it in different directions.

It's fücking mind-blowing.

Ah, the old non-local connectivity chestnut. Information moving freely in time-and-space? Or seemingly disparate events linked through another, invisible dimension. I prefer the latter as a conceptual model, but the first is more spooky and therefore, fun.

[Peter]

Gosh, you must be really, really, really intelligent. You put me to shame and I feel utterly humiliated. Really I do.

Now, tell us all you know about probability theory and we can all have a good laugh at your expense.

I'm **** at crosswords as well. I am not remotely ashamed of it. Some of the dullest, least interesting people I know are brilliant at them.

[Rich]

did you see University Challenge the other night?

we have our new Bobby Seagull.

Wait... let me guess; he’s reading Ancient Greek at Magdelin, Oxford?