Anything that causes discomfort for that soulless ghoul Zuckerberg has to be

[SWv2]

They changed the terms of the agreement without fully acknowledging the uses to which these changed functionalities would be put.

Diddums!!!

[IUFG]

... which is probably embedded somewhere in the hundreds and hundreds of lines of their Terms and Conditions of use.

I'm sure I read somewhere that the terms and conditions of use for Facebook contains more words than the US Constitution. Speaks volumes about both really...

[Herbert Augustus Chapman]

Diddums!!!

I'm sure that will be an irrefutable defence when the company that employs you to know about these things finds itself in the dock s

[SWv2]

I'm sure that will be an irrefutable defence when the company that employs you to know about these things finds itself in the dock s

If something illegal has happened then Facebook or Cambridge Analytics deserve to be held accountable however if data has been harvested in line with agreed Terms and Conditions and now people are violated and offended as they don't like why the data was used then fúck them.

Remarkable stupidity of the people to think they were handing over all this data to a global giant who ask for no financial donation, and to then think said data was not being used for x, y and z.

[Burney]

If something illegal has happened then Facebook or Cambridge Analytics deserve to be held accountable however if data has been harvested in line with agreed Terms and Conditions and now people are violated and offended as they don't like why the data was used then fúck them.

Remarkable stupidity of the people to think they were handing over all this data to a global giant who ask for no financial donation, and to then think said data was not being used for x, y and z.

Can we please stop talking about people being 'violated', though? I associate being violated with being non-consensually bummed, not with having some nerd using my personal information to get me to vote the way I probably would have anyway.

[Sir C]

Can we please stop talking about people being 'violated', though? I associate being violated with being non-consensually bummed, not with having some nerd using my personal information to get me to vote the way I probably would have anyway.

No one, without using physical coercion, can get you to vote in a particular way. This whole brouhaha seems predicated on an acceptance that voters lack any agency and can manipulated like children.

[SWv2]

Can we please stop talking about people being 'violated', though? I associate being violated with being non-consensually bummed, not with having some nerd using my personal information to get me to vote the way I probably would have anyway.

Their privacy has been violated or whatever.

I would shoot the fúckers never mind violate them*

*I would not bum them.

[Burney]

No one, without using physical coercion, can get you to vote in a particular way. This whole brouhaha seems predicated on an acceptance that voters lack any agency and can manipulated like children.

Of course. It's a classic post hoc fallacy. 'We spunked a load of money on all this sh1t. Our side won and therefore it's spunking all this money wot won it'.

[Burney]

Their privacy has been violated or whatever.

I would shoot the fúckers never mind violate them*

*I would not bum them.

On the whole (hole?) I would rather be bummed than shot.

[IUFG]

This whole brouhaha seems predicated on an acceptance that voters lack any agency and can manipulated like children.

Party. Political. Broadcasts.