Click here for Arsenal FC news and reports

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: Of course, the last time we played CSKA Moscow, Russian assassins watched and left a

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Of course, the last time we played CSKA Moscow, Russian assassins watched and left a

    trail of polonium at the Emirates.

    So that bodes well.

  2. #2
    Some facts about 'Novichoks' btw.

    1) Porton Down has acknowledged in publications it has never seen any Russian “novichoks”. The UK government has absolutely no “fingerprint” information such as impurities that can safely attribute this substance to Russia.
    2) Until now, neither Porton Down nor the world’s experts at the Organisation for the Prevention of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) were convinced “Novichoks” even exist.
    3) The UK is refusing to provide a sample to the OPCW.
    4) “Novichoks” were specifically designed to be able to be manufactured from common ingredients on any scientific bench. The Americans dismantled and studied the facility that allegedly developed them. It is completely untrue only the Russians could make them, if anybody can.
    5) The “Novichok” programme was in Uzbekistan not in Russia. Its legacy was inherited by the Americans during their alliance with Karimov, not by the Russians.

    Source: Craig Murray.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Ash View Post
    Some facts about 'Novichoks' btw.

    1) Porton Down has acknowledged in publications it has never seen any Russian “novichoks”. The UK government has absolutely no “fingerprint” information such as impurities that can safely attribute this substance to Russia.
    2) Until now, neither Porton Down nor the world’s experts at the Organisation for the Prevention of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) were convinced “Novichoks” even exist.
    3) The UK is refusing to provide a sample to the OPCW.
    4) “Novichoks” were specifically designed to be able to be manufactured from common ingredients on any scientific bench. The Americans dismantled and studied the facility that allegedly developed them. It is completely untrue only the Russians could make them, if anybody can.
    5) The “Novichok” programme was in Uzbekistan not in Russia. Its legacy was inherited by the Americans during their alliance with Karimov, not by the Russians.

    Source: Craig Murray.
    Complete bull**** from Murray which has been debunked by scientists - bit more research and you will find that

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda View Post
    Complete bull**** from Murray which has been debunked by scientists - bit more research and you will find that
    The man is a complete fraud/clown

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by PSRB View Post
    The man is a complete fraud/clown
    Harsh on Ash but if he does believe these lunatics...

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda View Post
    Harsh on Ash but if he does believe these lunatics...
    Debunked by 'scientists'....

    I work with an awful lot of 'scientists'..... most of them couldnt find their back pockets with both hands.

    You can prove anything with 'science'

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Ash View Post
    Some facts about 'Novichoks' btw.

    1) Porton Down has acknowledged in publications it has never seen any Russian “novichoks”. The UK government has absolutely no “fingerprint” information such as impurities that can safely attribute this substance to Russia.
    2) Until now, neither Porton Down nor the world’s experts at the Organisation for the Prevention of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) were convinced “Novichoks” even exist.
    3) The UK is refusing to provide a sample to the OPCW.
    4) “Novichoks” were specifically designed to be able to be manufactured from common ingredients on any scientific bench. The Americans dismantled and studied the facility that allegedly developed them. It is completely untrue only the Russians could make them, if anybody can.
    5) The “Novichok” programme was in Uzbekistan not in Russia. Its legacy was inherited by the Americans during their alliance with Karimov, not by the Russians.

    Source: Craig Murray.
    You fvcking bot, get off our board.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Ash View Post
    Some facts about 'Novichoks' btw.

    1) Porton Down has acknowledged in publications it has never seen any Russian “novichoks”. The UK government has absolutely no “fingerprint” information such as impurities that can safely attribute this substance to Russia.
    2) Until now, neither Porton Down nor the world’s experts at the Organisation for the Prevention of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) were convinced “Novichoks” even exist.
    3) The UK is refusing to provide a sample to the OPCW.
    4) “Novichoks” were specifically designed to be able to be manufactured from common ingredients on any scientific bench. The Americans dismantled and studied the facility that allegedly developed them. It is completely untrue only the Russians could make them, if anybody can.
    5) The “Novichok” programme was in Uzbekistan not in Russia. Its legacy was inherited by the Americans during their alliance with Karimov, not by the Russians.

    Source: Craig Murray.
    Do you reckon Theresa May did it to start a war with Russia so that the Tories don’t lose heavily in the council elections, a?

    My money is on it being a new-Nazi Ukrainian false flag. Either way, that nice Mr Putin is clearly innocent. Just consider his record of only occasionally slaughtering anyone who opposes him.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Sir C View Post
    Do you reckon Theresa May did it to start a war with Russia so that the Tories don’t lose heavily in the council elections, a?

    My money is on it being a new-Nazi Ukrainian false flag. Either way, that nice Mr Putin is clearly innocent. Just consider his record of only occasionally slaughtering anyone who opposes him.
    a right now.

    Why-are-customers-so-rude-Here-are-5-reasons-07-1024x569.jpg

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Burney View Post
    I’m not discounting the possibility of it being a Jewish-American banking conspiracy, naturally.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •