I do like how barking mad Noel Edmonds is these days. Not content with banging on

[Burney]

about how we're all made from vibrating energy and having plastic surgery that makes him look like a sad Yorkshire terrier, he's now opened a radio station with the sole intention of having a go at Lloyd's Bank.

Top batshíttery.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-42963128

Edmonds.jpg

[Ash]

about how we're all made from vibrating energy and having plastic surgery that makes him look like a sad Yorkshire terrier, he's now opened a radio station with the sole intention of having a go at Lloyd's Bank.

Top batshíttery.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-42963128

Edmonds.jpg

Sounds good. Has he got into reptilians yet?

[Burney]

Sounds good. Has he got into reptilians yet?

Not as far as I know, but it can't be long. I suppose in his defence he's about the only Radio 1 DJ of the 70s/80s who as far as we know didn't have sex with children, so we should cut him some slack.

Actually, I was thinking about David Icke the other day. Why is it OK to laugh at his claim that he's the son of God, but not OK to laugh at a hairy-arsed bloke who tells you he's a woman? Why are some mental aberrations OK and others not?

[Monty92]

What would you do if you met a transer who you knew wanted to be referred to by their non-biological pronoun?

Or, to put it another way, are there any contexts you can dscribe in which you would refuse to refer to them as they preferred?

Not as far as I know, but it can't be long. I suppose in his defence he's about the only Radio 1 DJ of the 70s/80s who as far as we know didn't have sex with children, so we should cut him some slack.

Actually, I was thinking about David Icke the other day. Why is it OK to laugh at his claim that he's the son of God, but not OK to laugh at a hairy-arsed bloke who tells you he's a woman? Why are some mental aberrations OK and others not?

[Burney]

What would you do if you met a transer who you knew wanted to be referred to by their non-biological pronoun?

Or, to put it another way, are there any contexts you can dscribe in which you would refuse to refer to them as they preferred?

I would address them by the name by which they were introduced and I would endeavour to avoid causing unnecessary offence by not referring to their sex within their earshot. However, I will not lie or connive in a lie by calling a man 'she' or acquiescing in the absurd pretence that what I have in front of me is an actual woman/man when it is plainly not.

[World's End Stella]

I would address them by the name by which they were introduced and I would endeavour to avoid causing unnecessary offence by not referring to their sex within their earshot. However, I will not lie or connive in a lie by calling a man 'she' or acquiescing in the absurd pretence that what I have in front of me is an actual woman/man when it is plainly not.

What if it isn't plainly obvious what it is? Bloke/bird on one of those Jordan Peterson debates I watched on youtube was not plainly one or the other.

Gave me the shivers just listening to it.

[Monty92]

I would address them by the name by which they were introduced and I would endeavour to avoid causing unnecessary offence by not referring to their sex within their earshot. However, I will not lie or connive in a lie by calling a man 'she' or acquiescing in the absurd pretence that what I have in front of me is an actual woman/man when it is plainly not.

Really? I don't have any objection at all to calling them what they are plainly not, if that's what they want.

Just as if someone with an objectively terrible voice told you they have ambitions of being a singer, I'm sure you'd nod, smile and wish them the best of luck (which would be tantamount to lying).

[IUFG]

I would address them by the name by which they were introduced and I would endeavour to avoid causing unnecessary offence by not referring to their sex within their earshot. However, I will not lie or connive in a lie by calling a man 'she' or acquiescing in the absurd pretence that what I have in front of me is an actual woman/man when it is plainly not.

I'm doing my bit, b.

I said "Thanks, mate" to a rather tall, stocky Store Assistant at Tesco this lunchtime.

Although, she didn't look too pleased that I used a non-gender specific pronoun towards her.

There's no pleasing some people...

[Peter]

Not as far as I know, but it can't be long. I suppose in his defence he's about the only Radio 1 DJ of the 70s/80s who as far as we know didn't have sex with children, so we should cut him some slack.

Actually, I was thinking about David Icke the other day. Why is it OK to laugh at his claim that he's the son of God, but not OK to laugh at a hairy-arsed bloke who tells you he's a woman? Why are some mental aberrations OK and others not?

True. Funny that you mention Icke right after the whole BBC ***** thing. You know icke was called mad for saying all of that was happening about 10-15 years ago? And that politicians like Cyril smith and ted Heath were involved along with saville?

What a loony