Hard to think of a worse indictment of the penal system.
https://twitter.com/aboosalik/status/948477731825766400
That said, you have to wonder if victim number three knew about victims 1 & 2 and figured she could change him, don't you?
And what about that inveterate ****-stain Ian Huntely, the Soham murderer.
I'll never forget the palpable discomfort of the senior policeman who had to inform a press conference that Huntley had fourteen previous contacts with various police forces all involving predatory sexual behaviour with under age girls.
It does seem to me that there is a tendency to forget that the criminal justice system is not simply there to punish and/or reform, but to protect the public from dangerous individuals.
Not enough consideration is given to recidivism, for instance. For years I parroted the standard liberal line on the death penalty about it being better that 1,000 guilty men go free than that one innocent man be executed, but came to realise that it's *******s, since it ignores the fact that when those guilty men go free (or are released from prison after 10-15 years) innocent people invariably die as a result. A simple utilitarian calculation should tell you therefore that the greatest good for the greatest number is served by the death penalty.
That said, I still find the idea of living in a country that practises the death penalty rather distasteful, so remain ambivalent on then subject.