I bloody love Giroud. Deserves to start against West Ham

[Monty92]

It's almost as if as he's a one trick pony and everyone has figured it out

I find your and Peter's comments incredible. For me, Sanchez is one of the top ten players in the world, Geoff.

And as you point out, even when he's shít, he still produces.

[Luis Anaconda]

I find your and Peter's comments incredible. For me, Sanchez is one of the top ten players in the world, Geoff.

And as you point out, even when he's shít, he still produces.

67 times in two matches he has given the ball away. Top ten players, my arse

[Monty92]

67 times in two matches he has given the ball away. Top ten players, my arse

I don't know how those stats compare with other strikers. Is it a total anomaly for a player of his ilk to give the ball away so much? Could it be skewed by the fact that he is often trying to create for us and therefore eschews 'safe' passes?

Also, what were his stats in the two previous games when he was, by all accounts, fantastic?

[Luis Anaconda]

I don't know how those stats compare with other strikers. Is it a total anomaly for a player of his ilk to give the ball away so much? Could it be skewed by the fact that he is often trying to create for us and therefore eschews 'safe' passes?

Also, what were his stats in the two previous games when he was, by all accounts, fantastic?

They are terrible by any measure - if you can't see it by watching him and ignore the stats, you probably should get another hobby, tbh. You are ****ing clueless about football.

[Monty92]

They are terrible by any measure - if you can't see it by watching him and ignore the stats, you probably should get another hobby, tbh. You are ****ing clueless about football.

Maybe I don't. I guess this is also why no decent clubs have any interest in signing him

[Luis Anaconda]

Maybe I don't. I guess this is also why no decent clubs have any interest in signing him

He's a good player - he is not one of the best ten players in the world. You argue like a child

[Monty92]

He's a good player - he is not one of the best ten players in the world. You argue like a child

How dare you?*

*He is so ner.

[Peter]

He's a good player - he is not one of the best ten players in the world. You argue like a child

I think he would probably be even worse in a better side. City dodged a bullet there. THey absolutely do not need him.

[Pat Vegas]

They are terrible by any measure - if you can't see it by watching him and ignore the stats, you probably should get another hobby, tbh. You are ****ing clueless about football.

even if he creates 'one moment of magic' it's not worth all the possession he loses.

it's like if I played in a 5-a-side (non awimb won) and my team loses 10-1 but I score the tremendous 1 goal.

[Peter]

even if he creates 'one moment of magic' it's not worth all the possession he loses.

it's like if I played in a 5-a-side (non awimb won) and my team loses 10-1 but I score the tremendous 1 goal.

Moment of magic+89 minutes of complete and utter ****= substitute.

If we want a footballing cretin who might create something from the bench we already have THeo. Although that ****ing beard is going to take some getting used to.