Click here for Arsenal FC news and reports

Page 7 of 10 FirstFirst ... 56789 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 96

Thread: Hopefully the football ignoramuses on here now realise why Xhaka/Ramsey will never

  1. #61
    Quote Originally Posted by Burney View Post
    5.5 million long-term migrants arrived in the UK between 1997 and 2010, p. By no means all of them were EU citizens (although Labour's over-hasty and unforced acceptance of Eastern European migration is another matter). In fact, the official muslim population doubled between 2000 and 2010 and most of that wasn't from the EU. And those are just the legal ones. The number of NI numbers issued for work suggests the number is half as big again.

    All of which happened under Blair and latterly Brown. Because Labour wanted to 'rub the right's nose in diversity'.

    Cheers for that.
    Baby boomers retiring, ageing workforce. We need 3 million more over the next 5-10 years according to a hugely remain-focused think tank

    Its not TB's fault that you don't like them.

  2. #62
    Quote Originally Posted by redgunamo View Post
    Good point, although personally, I'd play him at wing-back.

    I'm not entirely sure what a "wing-back" is, of course, but it does seem to be in fashion.
    Traditionally it was a full back that was **** at defending. We have plenty of them but Wenger's seems determined to play them at centre back.

  3. #63
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter View Post
    Baby boomers retiring, ageing workforce. We need 3 million more over the next 5-10 years according to a hugely remain-focused think tank

    Its not TB's fault that you don't like them.
    Or that yous lot is all jaffas.
    Last edited by redgunamo; 08-21-2017 at 10:35 AM.
    "Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.

    "But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."

  4. #64
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter View Post
    Traditionally it was a full back that was **** at defending. We have plenty of them but Wenger's seems determined to play them at centre back.
    There you are then; that sounds ideal, perfect for #Welbz. It keeps him far away from either goal and makes good use of his size, his pace and his gameness.
    "Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.

    "But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."

  5. #65
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter View Post
    Baby boomers retiring, ageing workforce. We need 3 million more over the next 5-10 years according to a hugely remain-focused think tank

    Its not TB's fault that you don't like them.
    That view, of course, is based on the rather iffy premise that constant increase in population is a good or a necessary thing. It isn't. Also, since immigration constituted a net cost to the country of £100 billion between 2004 and 2014 according to the UCL study, please tell me how all this immigration is improving our standard of living or helping our infrastructure?
    Last edited by Burney; 08-21-2017 at 10:41 AM.

  6. #66
    Quote Originally Posted by Burney View Post
    That view, of course, is based on the rather iffy premise that constant increase in population is a good or a necessary thing. It isn't. Also, since immigration constituted a net cost to the country of £100 billion between 2004 and 2014 according to the UCL study, please tell me how all this immigration is improving our standard of living or helping our infrastructure?
    A UCL study? **** off!

    The view is based on a rather old fashioned definition of the volume of working population required to support our retirees. You know, the old ****s that are coining it in now and voted to get rid of the foreigners that were supporting them.

    Just out of interest, how is that net cost calculated? Does it include overseas students?

  7. #67
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter View Post
    A UCL study? **** off!

    The view is based on a rather old fashioned definition of the volume of working population required to support our retirees. You know, the old ****s that are coining it in now and voted to get rid of the foreigners that were supporting them.

    Just out of interest, how is that net cost calculated? Does it include overseas students?
    You can't have it both ways. That same UCL study was shamelessly spun by pro-immigration types like yourself to pretend that immigration offered a net economic benefit, by looking solely at high-value EU migrants and ignoring the dregs of the third world your chums mysteriously decided to admit. In fact, needless to say, those people cost us a fūcking fortune (not to mention the higher incidence of general crime, rape, acid attacks, refusal to integrate and terrorism they bring with them, of course.

    Still... 'diversity' - Yay!

    Oh, and by the way, you'll notice that most of southern Europe is awash with unemployed youngsters who could just as easily have been encouraged to migrate here if we needed workers. Instead, Labour decided it would be better to massively increase the numbers of non-European, non-Christian non-white people who have - inevitably - brought with them a host of other problems. Because what's 'diversity' without more brown people, eh?

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...20bn-ucl-study

  8. #68
    Quote Originally Posted by Burney View Post
    You can't have it both ways. That same UCL study was shamelessly spun by pro-immigration types like yourself to pretend that immigration offered a net economic benefit, by looking solely at high-value EU migrants and ignoring the dregs of the third world your chums mysteriously decided to admit. In fact, needless to say, those people cost us a fūcking fortune (not to mention the higher incidence of general crime, rape, acid attacks, refusal to integrate and terrorism they bring with them, of course.

    Still... 'diversity' - Yay!

    Oh, and by the way, you'll notice that most of southern Europe is awash with unemployed youngsters who could just as easily have been encouraged to migrate here if we needed workers. Instead, Labour decided it would be better to massively increase the numbers of non-European, non-Christian non-white people who have - inevitably - brought with them a host of other problems. Because what's 'diversity' without more brown people, eh?

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...20bn-ucl-study
    I'm pretty sure you should now wexpect a knock on your door at 3 a.m. "Geheime Staatspolizei! Aufmachen!"

  9. #69
    Quote Originally Posted by Burney View Post
    You can't have it both ways. That same UCL study was shamelessly spun by pro-immigration types like yourself to pretend that immigration offered a net economic benefit, by looking solely at high-value EU migrants and ignoring the dregs of the third world your chums mysteriously decided to admit. In fact, needless to say, those people cost us a fūcking fortune (not to mention the higher incidence of general crime, rape, acid attacks, refusal to integrate and terrorism they bring with them, of course.

    Still... 'diversity' - Yay!

    Oh, and by the way, you'll notice that most of southern Europe is awash with unemployed youngsters who could just as easily have been encouraged to migrate here if we needed workers. Instead, Labour decided it would be better to massively increase the numbers of non-European, non-Christian non-white people who have - inevitably - brought with them a host of other problems. Because what's 'diversity' without more brown people, eh?

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...20bn-ucl-study
    Told you, didn't I? It's all your fault for letting the Windies off the hook way back when and giving them a easy ride. The reason you don't hate them is purely because you were "not allowed" to hate them. Much better to pick on Aussies and be embarrassed by Saffers. Nothing to do with skin colour, naturally.

    Thin end of the wedge though, wunnit. If you had all stood up for what was right and proper back then, you wouldn't be complaining now. Clearly the islams have learned those lessons well.
    "Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.

    "But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."

  10. #70
    You can't have it both ways either though; who is to preserve and protect your way of life?


    Quote Originally Posted by Burney View Post
    You can't have it both ways. That same UCL study was shamelessly spun by pro-immigration types like yourself to pretend that immigration offered a net economic benefit, by looking solely at high-value EU migrants and ignoring the dregs of the third world your chums mysteriously decided to admit. In fact, needless to say, those people cost us a fūcking fortune (not to mention the higher incidence of general crime, rape, acid attacks, refusal to integrate and terrorism they bring with them, of course.

    Still... 'diversity' - Yay!

    Oh, and by the way, you'll notice that most of southern Europe is awash with unemployed youngsters who could just as easily have been encouraged to migrate here if we needed workers. Instead, Labour decided it would be better to massively increase the numbers of non-European, non-Christian non-white people who have - inevitably - brought with them a host of other problems. Because what's 'diversity' without more brown people, eh?

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...20bn-ucl-study
    "Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.

    "But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •