Originally Posted by Monty92
She also approved the piece before it was published save for one amendment. She felt the photo of her wasn't very flattering and sent five different photos for them to use instead.
Oh dear
She also approved the piece before it was published save for one amendment. She felt the photo of her wasn't very flattering and sent five different photos for them to use instead.
Oh dear
In fairness to the silly bitch, I'd imagine there's a fair chance she didn't give final approval on the piece and she may well have objected to the headline and opening paragraph which were deliberately provocative, had it been here and not her team that gave sign off.
The photo thing is weird. It really is only women who give a shít about that kind of thing, isn't it? Why not just be mildly miffed and then get on with your life? How can it be so important to have an up-to-date photo?
Her biggest mistake seems to have been suggesting it was a problem with pakistani men. THat isn't terribly accurate given the ethnic make up of most of these gangs.
****ing stupid mistake to make.
Lols. You seriously reckon she'd have been fine had she been more forensic in how she described the statistical make-up of these blokes?
Not necessarily. But she gave them a very easy stick to beat her with. Its one thin g to be thought a racist, quite another to be racist AND wrong.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote