by the baby's paternal grandparents (Allans, natch )
Obviously this should be a criminal offence, yet the charge is Grevious Bodily Harm against the baby.
Surely if it's GBH against one baby, it is GBH against EVERY baby?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...d-circumcised/
Not every baby. I know a lot of dudes who still have their bits. In fact, I know a dude who sticks his loose bills up there so his friends don't roll him when he's drunk. They don't want to touch him there, you understand, because they ain't "bum buddies."
True!
Well, I don't know if it's actually true, but this is what he claims.