This is a weird one. Mother finds her baby has been circumcised without consent

[Monty92]

by the baby's paternal grandparents (Allans, natch )

Obviously this should be a criminal offence, yet the charge is Grevious Bodily Harm against the baby.

Surely if it's GBH against one baby, it is GBH against EVERY baby?


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...d-circumcised/

[Pat Vegas]

by the baby's paternal grandparents (Allans, natch )

Obviously this should be a criminal offence, yet the charge is Grevious Bodily Harm against the baby.

Surely if it's GBH against one baby, it is GBH against EVERY baby?


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...d-circumcised/

She should be compensated heavily plus tip.

[Ganpati's Goonerz--AFC's Aboriginal Fertility Cult]

by the baby's paternal grandparents (Allans, natch )

Obviously this should be a criminal offence, yet the charge is Grevious Bodily Harm against the baby.

Surely if it's GBH against one baby, it is GBH against EVERY baby?


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...d-circumcised/

If your glw decides to get a piercing, then that's fine. If I pierce her without her consent then that's GBH. A bit like sex without consent is rape.

And I guess that for a minor, consent on all things rests with the parents.

[eastgermanautos]

by the baby's paternal grandparents (Allans, natch )

Obviously this should be a criminal offence, yet the charge is Grevious Bodily Harm against the baby.

Surely if it's GBH against one baby, it is GBH against EVERY baby?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...d-circumcised/

Not every baby. I know a lot of dudes who still have their bits. In fact, I know a dude who sticks his loose bills up there so his friends don't roll him when he's drunk. They don't want to touch him there, you understand, because they ain't "bum buddies."

True!

Well, I don't know if it's actually true, but this is what he claims.