Click here for Arsenal FC news and reports

Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: City sign Silva for €70m.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by Luis Anaconda View Post
    You mean like the fact that the Pogba deal took Utd all of last summer's transfer window to conclude?
    Or the Stones deal that took City rather a lot of last summer to conclude?
    Or the numerous centre backs Chelsea tried to sign before settling on Luiz last summer?
    Or, to be more exotic, how Real spent all summer chasing De Gea and then actually missing out on him, the year before?
    Or the way we had Xhaka in the bag before the Euros?

    Almost like all clubs take some time over deals and do some immediately, us included.
    We ummed and ahhed about Mustafi's fee for over a month. Resulting in our only two fit CBs being Chambers and Holding at the start of the season. That is poor. Not blaming Arsene as I don't think he makes the decisions on finances.

    We also signed Lucas Perez at the end which was pointless as he was clearly never going to be a top PL player. He is 30 next year.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Rich View Post
    We ummed and ahhed about Mustafi's fee for over a month. Resulting in our only two fit CBs being Chambers and Holding at the start of the season. That is poor. Not blaming Arsene as I don't think he makes the decisions on finances.

    We also signed Lucas Perez at the end which was pointless as he was clearly never going to be a top PL player. He is 30 next year.
    Well, you are confusing newspaper gossip with reality and have totally ignored the point I was making, which I admit doesn't really surprise me

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Rich View Post
    We also signed Lucas Perez at the end which was pointless as he was clearly never going to be a top PL player. He is 30 next year.
    Perez has not even been given a chance. He can't be worse at football than Walcott, surely.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Ash View Post
    Perez has not even been given a chance. He can't be worse at football than Walcott, surely.
    Why would we give him a chance over the far superior Alexis, Welbeck Giroud, Ox? Tbh - Walcott isn't as one footed as Perez. I assume he was just insurance in case Welbeck broke down again.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Rich View Post
    Why would we give him a chance over the far superior Alexis, Welbeck Giroud, Ox? Tbh - Walcott isn't as one footed as Perez. I assume he was just insurance in case Welbeck broke down again.
    I think Perez has made a contribution whenever he has had a chance.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •