Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 5678 LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 77

Thread: A 70,000 salary defines you as rich?

  1. #61
    Quote Originally Posted by Ash View Post
    Opinion.

    Economic necessity drove me to rollups 30 years ago and it wasn't long before I preferred them to cigs, which to me now mainly taste of the chemical fuses in them to keep them burning.
    I did my chest in and made my fingers dirty and smelly.
    I am sure I would have got used to them.

  2. #62
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter View Post
    In neither circumstance are they rich. They still couldn't buy a **** house in an average area of London.
    Exactly. Really stoopid to call a 70k-incomer rich for this simple reason.

  3. #63
    Quote Originally Posted by Ash View Post
    Opinion.

    Economic necessity drove me to rollups 30 years ago and it wasn't long before I preferred them to cigs, which to me now mainly taste of the chemical fuses in them to keep them burning.
    Right on, brother.

  4. #64
    Quote Originally Posted by Pat Vegas View Post
    I did my chest in and made my fingers dirty and smelly.
    I am sure I would have got used to them.
    Good filters, the slimmer the better, and the right tobacco resolves this. I got used to them in a couple of days and fags now taste of **** to me.

  5. #65
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter View Post
    Good filters, the slimmer the better, and the right tobacco resolves this. I got used to them in a couple of days and fags now taste of **** to me.
    You look like a rolly smoker all the same.

  6. #66
    Quote Originally Posted by Sir C View Post
    What utter tosh. 70,000 equates to around 4,000 per month, net. Call it 1,000 per week.

    Now let's subtract essentials: Cigarettes and booze, 210 per week. Food, 200 per week.

    So we're left with 590 per week to pay for motoring expenses, eating out, holidays and staff?

    Fck off. Impossible.

    Obviously you can live reasonably comfortably on 70k (assuming you don't have a mortgage, naturally) but 'rich'? Absolute nonsense.

    Shows how out of touch with ordinary people the left is.
    So it's the top 5%. Surprisingly low value. I'd have figured that at over 100k. I'd happily pay more tax if I thought it would do any good, but I'd imagine they'll just piss it up the wall anyway.
    Last edited by AFC East; 04-20-2017 at 02:23 PM. Reason: I can now read.

  7. #67
    Quote Originally Posted by AFC East View Post
    Whose definition is it?
    John McDonell.

  8. #68
    Quote Originally Posted by SWv2 View Post
    You look like a rolly smoker all the same.
    You mean I look poor?

  9. #69
    Quote Originally Posted by Pat Vegas View Post
    She's Gene Simmons wife?

    There was another lady with dark hair and massive Bristols. Sodd would know this sort of thing
    She happens to be Canadian, doncha know. Was a Playboy Playmate when I was a young man in university.

    Bit of Canadian porn trivia for you chaps there.

  10. #70
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter View Post
    You mean I look poor?
    Yes, when I met you, you did. You also looked like a hippy deviant as well.

    No offence, of course.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •