Always nice to wake up to USA! USA! swinging its dick.

[Burney]

Good point.

One wonders about the extent of US satellite/radar coverage - you'd imagine that it would be pretty well constant in that area, so surely they'd have a record of aircraft launching and heading to the site of the attack?

Oh, yes. I don't think there can be any serious doubts the Assad forces did this. It's just a question of how and why. And, as any student of military history knows, one underestimates the capacity for people ballsing things up in war at one's peril.

[Rich]

Good point.

One wonders about the extent of US satellite/radar coverage - you'd imagine that it would be pretty well constant in that area, so surely they'd have a record of aircraft launching and heading to the site of the attack?

No no no - The US has been hoodwinked by ISIS/AQ who have dropped a huge chemical weapon from one of the ISIS Air Force's jets. It's obvious!

[Ash]

No no no - The US has been hoodwinked by ISIS/AQ who have dropped a huge chemical weapon from one of the ISIS Air Force's jets. It's obvious!

Remember 2013? Syria accused of using chem weapons?

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...t-assads-regi/

[Mo Britain less Europe]

If there were no chemical weapons why did the Russians sponsor an agreement for the Syrians to stop using them?

[Ash]

If there were no chemical weapons why did the Russians sponsor an agreement for the Syrians to stop using them?

The Syrian Govt did have chemical wepps, and they were gotten rid of with the help of the Russians, and verified by the UN.

For those speaking of the technicalities of tracking jets - even if that is taken to be true it does not indicate what sort of munitions were 'delivered'. The Islamists did have chemical weapons (as proven in the Turkish parliament) and it is feasible that a store of such has been hit.

[Alberto Balsam Rodriguez]

Do you think it might be because they're cvnts and, after Obama's pusilanimity last time, thought they'd get away with it.

Or, maybe they feel that they can push Trump's buttons more easily. After all, he is a bit of a fool, isn't he?

[eastgermanautos]

Or, maybe they feel that they can push Trump's buttons more easily. After all, he is a bit of a fool, isn't he?

Not just that but they think they own Trump. I guess Trump is proving them wrong, or at least, not completely right. :dickswinging: :hellyeah:

[eastgermanautos]

Or, maybe they feel that they can push Trump's buttons more easily. After all, he is a bit of a fool, isn't he?

It's also, when people are winning, they sometimes want to go one step beyond. And then when they do, their intentions are laid completely bare. This is just what happened in this case. But it's also happened in some other cases, some interpersonal cases. Like when someone you're talking to just goes a bit far, and then you're all like, all right mutherfvcker. I get it.

In another example, in Untouchables, when Al Capone/Deniro splays this guy's head over the tiles by means of a bat. The dude was like, "yes yes, of course, Al Capone." Bam.

[redgunamo]

Nobody believes that ****e anymore, I'm afraid. I gorged at that trough for years and I wouldn't even let them verify that today is Monday. Bloody good job too.

The Syrian Govt did have chemical wepps, and they were gotten rid of with the help of the Russians, and verified by the UN.

For those speaking of the technicalities of tracking jets - even if that is taken to be true it does not indicate what sort of munitions were 'delivered'. The Islamists did have chemical weapons (as proven in the Turkish parliament) and it is feasible that a store of such has been hit.

[redgunamo]

Didn't take long for Trump to change his stance

He's never really had much of a "stance" on anything to change, certainly not foreign policy. Which is a good thing because most voters don't have one either.