Quote Originally Posted by Burney View Post
Oh, don't get me wrong! I've no issue with cross dressers (although I reserve the right to laugh at them, of course). If a chap likes popping on a frock, that is purely a matter between him, God and his tailor.
No, my issue is with this business of everyone going along with the absurd, unscientific nonsense that what is clearly a bloke should be regarded societally and legally as a woman. That is the point at which my head starts to throb with the sheer lunacy of it.
Yes. As a hound fancier, the whole thing makes perfect sense to me.

We say that the only difference between a dog and a bitch is that the bitch can have puppies. The clear implication being that if she does not or can not breed, gender is no longer a factor (when deciding upon her value and if and when to campaign, compete her, for instance).

It therefore follows that if society downgrades breeding, then gender, sex, cease to be of any but academic interest. So, at this point, what difference does it make.