Click here for Arsenal FC news and reports

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: Rugby rules.

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Rugby rules.

    It has struck me over the years that the rules of rugby have become more and more baffling, to the point where these days, attending perhaps two rugby matches per year, I spend half the game mystified as to what is actually going on.

    It would appear that I am not alone in this, and that the England team are similarly hazy about the details.

    What a fúcking state for a major international sport to get itself into.

  2. #2
    I can't claim to completely understand the full implications of what Italy did but I must say it sounds brilliant. The clips of baffled and furious England players are hilarious.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Sir C View Post
    It has struck me over the years that the rules of rugby have become more and more baffling, to the point where these days, attending perhaps two rugby matches per year, I spend half the game mystified as to what is actually going on.

    It would appear that I am not alone in this, and that the England team are similarly hazy about the details.

    What a fúcking state for a major international sport to get itself into.
    Twas a bit of a **** show tbh. England didn't adapt to it very well and i personally thought it was poor form from Italy. I mean, it didn't actually improve their chances of winning or scoring, it just stopped England from scoring 60+.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Billy Goat Sverige View Post
    Twas a bit of a **** show tbh. England didn't adapt to it very well and i personally thought it was poor form from Italy. I mean, it didn't actually improve their chances of winning or scoring, it just stopped England from scoring 60+.
    Surely part of the game is to try and stop your opponents from scoring freely. Assuming no laws of the game were broken then what occured?

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by SWv2 View Post
    Surely part of the game is to try and stop your opponents from scoring freely. Assuming no laws of the game were broken then what occured?
    I suppose you can liken it to parking the bus i.e. using the tactics that give you the best chance of winning. Really it was just them admitting they're rubbish.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Billy Goat Sverige View Post
    I suppose you can liken it to parking the bus i.e. using the tactics that give you the best chance of winning. Really it was just them admitting they're rubbish.
    I hate the term "parking the bus". Defending well is as much a part of the game as is fancy intricate passing triangles.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by SWv2 View Post
    I hate the term "parking the bus". Defending well is as much a part of the game as is fancy intricate passing triangles.
    I agree in a football sense that good defending is an art - what happened in the rugby wasn't good defending it was exploiting a loophole in the law to the 9th degree. Inevitably, the law will change so can't blame Italy for trying it

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Billy Goat Sverige View Post
    Twas a bit of a **** show tbh. England didn't adapt to it very well and i personally thought it was poor form from Italy. I mean, it didn't actually improve their chances of winning or scoring, it just stopped England from scoring 60+.
    Well since they were winning 10-5 at half time it obviously did increase their chances of winning
    Last edited by Pokster; 02-27-2017 at 10:51 AM.
    Northern Monkey ... who can't upload a bleeding Avatar

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Pokster View Post
    Well since they were winning 10-5 at half time it obviously did increase their chances of winning
    Not really. They went into half-time leading against Wales and playing the conventional way. Their trouble is and always has been that they drop off physically in the last 20-25 minutes of games. Their points before half-time came from penalties and had nothing to do with their lack of rucking. As i said before, it was purely a spoiler tactic. They were always going to get battered, this just sopped it being a 40-50 point battering.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Billy Goat Sverige View Post
    Not really. They went into half-time leading against Wales and playing the conventional way. Their trouble is and always has been that they drop off physically in the last 20-25 minutes of games. Their points before half-time came from penalties and had nothing to do with their lack of rucking. As i said before, it was purely a spoiler tactic. They were always going to get battered, this just sopped it being a 40-50 point battering.
    They were 2 points down with 10 minutes to go so your reasoning is flawed... they had a game plan and almost pulled it off. wd Italy imo
    Northern Monkey ... who can't upload a bleeding Avatar

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •