Click here for Arsenal FC news and reports

Results 1 to 10 of 50

Thread: So, we're behind Spurs and the sky has not fallen

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by World's End Stella View Post
    And I loved watching Yanwama and Dembele controlling midfield with a very physical style of play. We used to have two midfielders like that.
    Wanyama seems to have recovered his ability to bundle opponents off the ball without getting penalised. He lost it for a while at Saints, who got pissed off with him being a card-magnet, I gather.

    tbh though I thought Chelsea played the better football overall, if you ignore the Delhi-Al-E shaped hole in their defence.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Ash View Post
    Wanyama seems to have recovered his ability to bundle opponents off the ball without getting penalised. He lost it for a while at Saints, who got pissed off with him being a card-magnet, I gather.

    tbh though I thought Chelsea played the better football overall, if you ignore the Delhi-Al-E shaped hole in their defence.
    Nothing wrong with a physical approach A.

    Dembele was superb from what I saw.

    They are a decent team, no point in denying it. Every bit as good as us but we have those little elements of stardust which they lack.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by SWv2 View Post
    They are a decent team, no point in denying it. Every bit as good as us but we have those little elements of stardust which they lack.
    I'm not denying it at all. As for stardust - Deli Ali is better than Ozil, as the song goes, and Harry Kane is better than Giroud.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by SWv2 View Post
    Nothing wrong with a physical approach A.

    Dembele was superb from what I saw.

    They are a decent team, no point in denying it. Every bit as good as us but we have those little elements of stardust which they lack.
    It's the quality of their delivery from wide areas where they have the edge on us. Pisses me off.

    Also, why can't we produce a Harry Kane?

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Monty92 View Post
    It's the quality of their delivery from wide areas where they have the edge on us. Pisses me off.

    Also, why can't we produce a Harry Kane?
    We did produce him, I thought? Point taken though.

    Few big clubs can grow their own world class forwards, not just us.
    "Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.

    "But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by redgunamo View Post
    We did produce him, I thought? Point taken though.

    Few big clubs can grow their own world class forwards, not just us.
    Yeah but why can it be them but not us. I guess they might justifiably ask why they can never finish above us, even when we've had a supposedly **** season and they've had a great one

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Monty92 View Post
    Yeah but why can it be them but not us. I guess they might justifiably ask why they can never finish above us, even when we've had a supposedly **** season and they've had a great one
    Because we are a much, much bigger club than them with the resources and finances to go with it. It is only normal than on most occasions the bigger teams end at the top.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Monty92 View Post
    Yeah but why can it be them but not us. I guess they might justifiably ask why they can never finish above us, even when we've had a supposedly **** season and they've had a great one
    They can keep him, imo. We are a Champions League club, they are not.
    "Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.

    "But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Ash View Post
    Wanyama seems to have recovered his ability to bundle opponents off the ball without getting penalised. He lost it for a while at Saints, who got pissed off with him being a card-magnet, I gather.

    tbh though I thought Chelsea played the better football overall, if you ignore the Delhi-Al-E shaped hole in their defence.
    Chelsea were average, I thought. They always are when I watch them (Us, Liverpool and last night).

    Have they actually beaten anyone decent lately?
    "Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.

    "But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by redgunamo View Post
    Chelsea were average, I thought. They always are when I watch them (Us, Liverpool and last night).

    Have they actually beaten anyone decent lately?
    My experience as well this season. I was amazed at how much space there was in midfield for Spurs to knock it about. Players like Wanyama and Dembele were receiving the ball in the middle of the pitch with no Chelsea player within 5 yards.

    As far as I remember Chelsea beat only City that were any good. And for the first 60 minutes of that game City ripped them apart and should have been 2 or 3 nil up. Chelsea were very lucky that day.

    So basically Liverpool or Spurs will win the league

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •