[QUOTE=World's End Stella;4136318]
Quote Originally Posted by Burney View Post

Don't be absurd, of course it's whataboutery and you know it.

Judges are paid to be impartial and objective and intelligent in the execution of their responsibilities. Donald Trump made it clear that a particular judge was unable to do that because of his race. That, by any sensible decision, is racism.
So you are seriously trying to suggest that factors such as sex, political outlook, wealth, upbringing, social background, education, race, religion or class could never influence a judge's decision on an issue close to their heart and that any suggestion that they might is an outrageous slur that, in the case of racial background, instantly constitutes racism?
Laughable nonsense. Suggesting a potential conflict of interests leading to to a lack of impartiality is not racism. It may not be correct, but it isn't racism and if that's the best argument you've got for Trump being a racist, it's appallingly weak.
The example of black people arguing that white judges and juries are not impartial in cases involving black people was used to illustrate this fact. People may not agree with the suggestion of bias, but nobody - NOBODY - ever calls it racist. Why not? Because nobody in their right mind believes it is. And if it isn't, neither is what Trump said.