Least surprising news of the year

[World's End Stella]

No, sorry, but if your reason for not employing him is that there is a question of guilt hanging over him, there can be no possible excuse for then employing him when his guilt is proved once again. That's a total nonsense.

Because the reason for not employing him now does not necessarily have to be the guilt hanging over him. It could be that you think that the appeal process itself might reveal evidence that impacts your decision regardless of the outcome. It could be a question of practicality; why take a difficult decision now when you could take an easy decision in the near future. You may wish to gauge how public opinion does or does not change over the course of the appeal, there are a number of reasons.

[dismalswamp]

Didn't that stupid Ennis-Hill bint make a public show of condemning Evans and using her celebrity status to shame Sheffield United into removing some kind of ****ing bench with her name on or something?

[eastgermanautos]

It's 'hanged'

Not for me it ain't, dude. :badumpum-pish:

[redgunamo]

Didn't that stupid Ennis-Hill bint make a public show of condemning Evans and using her celebrity status to shame Sheffield United into removing some kind of ****ing bench with her name on or something?

She was put in a difficult spot, in fairness. And anyway, the presumption of innocence precedes the trial and doesn't apply to the review; at the time she said dem fings, he *was* a convicted rapist.