So Kronke has "waived" his £3 million fee after suggestions it might be illegal

[Mo Britain less Europe]

Funny. Loadsapeople here defended it at the time.

[Pat Vegas]

Funny. Loadsapeople here defended it at the time.

Can I have it instead?

[Pokster]

Funny. Loadsapeople here defended it at the time.

Was always a rather touchy subject, he doesn't own the club (just largest shareholder) so it can't be a dividend.... it was for a job that was never explained.

[PSRB]

Funny. Loadsapeople here defended it at the time.

I still do defend it and the other point is we made a £2.9m profit....not difficult to see why he didn't take his £3m

[Ash]

Funny. Loadsapeople here defended it at the time.

Yes, we were told to be grateful that he took such a modest stipend. We were also reminded that we are a business, not a football club, so we as customers have no business worrying about the internal affairs of the business of which we are mere customers.

[IUFG]

Absolutely. "Thanks for your interest in our affairs"

[Sir C]

Funny. Loadsapeople here defended it at the time.

Well, I'd always defend the right of a business to pay an agreed amount to another business for an agreed service. I'm not convinced that's particularly radical thinking.

How is business done on your planet, m?

[Ash]

Well, I'd always defend the right of a business to pay an agreed amount to another business for an agreed service. I'm not convinced that's particularly radical thinking.

That depends what the service is. So far no-one has been able to tell us.

Perhaps it's blow-jobs.

[Keith]

That depends what the service is. So far no-one has been able to tell us.

Perhaps it's blow-jobs.

You Not Get Yours Yet?

[Sir C]

That depends what the service is. So far no-one has been able to tell us.

Perhaps it's blow-jobs.

Yes, and no one needs to tell us about it because it's got fúck all to do with us.

HMRC, yes. The SFO, perhaps. The general public, no.