Centre-half?
The two double winning sides were all GG's. The invincibles had Sol and Keown. Even the 2006 CL final team had Sol (though Senderos got us there alongside Kolo.)
So is Kostafi the best not to have any Georgie Graham input?
Centre-half?
The two double winning sides were all GG's. The invincibles had Sol and Keown. Even the 2006 CL final team had Sol (though Senderos got us there alongside Kolo.)
So is Kostafi the best not to have any Georgie Graham input?
Apart from the stuff about a partnership being judged in more than about four games. But the signs so far are good.
"Plenty of strikers can score goals," he said, gesturing to the famous old stands casting shadows around us.
"But a lot have found it difficult wearing the number 9 shirt for The Arsenal."
Eh? The title of the post was "Is this the best Arsenal CB pairing not to contain at least 1 George Graham trained" with the post continuing "Centre-Half"?
The whole point was that all AW's best defences contained at least one GG trained CH.
Do Kostafi have the potential to be the best since then?
FFS.
the Invincibles defence was bascially Sol and Kolo. Keown played a small part and the 3 games he played that season cannot be construed as one of Arsene's best defensive partnerships because it was ONLY THREE GAMES.
and seeing as the Invincibles defence was basically two non-GG trained CHs (Kolo and Sol) your point fails to stand.The whole point was that all AW's best defences contained at least one GG trained CH.
He played the Friday night against Newcastle after that game and then never started another league for us. That was in September. Hard to argue he was an integral part of the team by then. It is also arguable whether he was a George Graham trained centre-half in comparison to Adams and Bould. GG ****ed him out the window as soon as he arrived and when he bought he back he often played him out of position