For instance, this chap's complaint about being made to feel like a scrounger because of his disability is very sad and everything, but - due to being banned - I'm unable to satisfy my deep-seated urge to ask whether he is perhaps perceived as a scrounger due to having short arms and deep pockets
I don't suppose someone else with an account on there would do it for me?
https://www.theguardian.com/society/...p-benefits-cut
Nice......Originally Posted by Burney
For instance, this chap's complaint about being made to feel like a scrounger because of his disability is very sad and everything, but - due to being banned - I'm unable to satisfy my deep-seated urge to ask whether he is perhaps perceived as a scrounger due to having short arms and deep pockets
I don't suppose someone else with an account on there would do it for me?
https://www.theguardian.com/society/...p-benefits-cut
Northern Monkey ... who can't upload a bleeding Avatar
Did you read this?For instance, this chap's complaint about being made to feel like a scrounger because of his disability is very sad and everything, but - due to being banned - I'm unable to satisfy my deep-seated urge to ask whether he is perhaps perceived as a scrounger due to having short arms and deep pockets
I don't suppose someone else with an account on there would do it for me?
https://www.theguardian.com/society/...p-benefits-cut
https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...alk-out-on-her
Beyond parody is not even the start of it.
Yes. They did actually print the text of Shriver's wholly rational and intelligent speech yesterday, but decided to double down on the stupidity by publishing another piece defending cultural appropriation today.
I wonder if it's a coincidence that they're reached peak Guardian at the same time they've started going cap in hand to readers. Almost as if they're saying "Look! Look at the unmitigated *******s we're having to publish to pull in more readers as our business model falls further down the ****ter! Help us!"
Possibly. Eventually their only realistic business model will be to go behind a paywall and cater purely for left-wing lunatics who never want any reality to intrude on their news or comment.
I can't actually read that m - the self-indulgent bull**** of the intro means I can't get to the actual meat (can I say meat in this context) of her argument. What the flying **** is she on about?
Basically, a white person shouldn't write about the fictional experiences of a black person because racism
ty
What utter bull****
Yes. The argument is very effectively dismantled by the very speech to which she chose not to listen. Which, I guess, is why she walked out.
https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...-a-passing-fad
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote