Reply With QuoteIt seems more the case that they're understandably reluctant to turn their back on himOriginally Posted by Monty92
Brave or stupid? I would have ****ing legged it.
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/v...-tasered-video
It seems more the case that they're understandably reluctant to turn their back on him
What? They had every chance to run. And then one of them returned and physically engaged him.
Pair of cowards. How come they waited for the police to put him down?
That's what 70 years of socialism does to a society. No moral fibre. Shirk the responsibility and wait for the civil servants to do the dirty work.
Did someone back at the nick switch the tazer for a BB gun ? That thing seemed pretty bloody useless tbh
Surely once fired, the victim should be rolling around like Pepe in a cup final.
Even more disappointing that, once the civil servants turned up, they didn't have the means to just blow the ****'s head off and save us the expense of trying and imprisoning him.
I've no sound but did the first police man on the scene not have a taser? Or was he just useless?
It's seems silly that the Police in England don't carry guns given the terrorist threat. What's the argument against it? It works fine in Northern Ireland.
When they're allowed guns they tend to shoot the wrong bloke and then have to make up tedious justifications for why they shot them.
No such thing as shooting the wrong bloke, j. Everyone's guilty of something.
Bit draconian for Fare Avoision though
Posting Permissions