Reply With QuoteGibbs decent second string if he chooses to stay on that basis. Chesney only acceptable as no. 2 if Ospina leaves and not replaced.
The rest can go - there's 10 on yer list btw.
Should be able to get not 9 but I'd say 3/4 improvements on them.
Unfortunately his weakness is not doing these things sooner hence hampering our challenges season after season. He really must crack down sooner else he can forget leading us on a title charge in his dying years.
Anyway Ive not seen a single mention on the disappearance of the following diabolically **** players >
Kieren Gibbs
Mikel Arteta
Mattieu Flamini
Calum Chambers
Mattieu Debuchy
All should be flogged off in Summer without a smudgeoun of thanks. Add the following dross to these and we may recoup signing on fees for new superstars.
Get rid list
Sczceney
Giroud
Walcott
Oxlade Chamberlain
Gnabry
Thats 9 players out which frees up plenty of compensation and allows for 9 world class superstars. Next season could be very exciting indeed.
Gibbs decent second string if he chooses to stay on that basis. Chesney only acceptable as no. 2 if Ospina leaves and not replaced.
The rest can go - there's 10 on yer list btw.
Should be able to get not 9 but I'd say 3/4 improvements on them.
Never been a fan of Gibbs and Chesney is too much of a clown which is a shame as he is otherwise a decent keeper. Chambers will not make the grade. The only one Id try with is Gnabry.Originally Posted by Mo Britain less Europe
Don't think Gibbs will stay anyway.
I'd be happy to give Matt Macey a chance as no. 2 except I've varely seen him play.
Trouble with Chambers is that he's (mostly) been played out of position. I'd like to him in central defence for a few games before condemning him.
cant see how he would sell chambers , that would admit making an error and when has he ever done that
he ll go on loan eventually in a couple of years before leaving on a free like all the other dross
I'd be inclined to keep Chambers, Gibbs and Gnabry.
Walcott will stay because no-one else will stump up for his 100k+ wages
They will. And if not near enough so that when you add the signing-on fee he won't lose out. His alternative is probably a quiet decline and the end of his England ambitions.
Walcott is a very good con artist. I think we should keep him so he can sell fake real estate to old ladies over the phone.
Posting Permissions
